A so-called ‘documentary’ covering the five-year term of New Zealand socialist prime minister Jacinda Ardern was shown at the Sundance Film Festival this week. But why was it made?
3. through 2021 I heard people around the entire North Island, not only express their unmitigated hatred for that incompetent, uncharismatic and cognitively challenged , sclerotic bag of bones, but also describe in detail how she should be killed. One had thereto underestimated the imaginative capacity of one's compatriots.
4. in re point 3.; Back in 1984, after the snap election called by Muldoon, there were clear divisions in politics, and some folks hated Muldoon, some hated David Lange.
5. re point 4.; I never heard anyone say how they would kill either of them. To have both instinctive and rationally considered ire against [we don't say her name] on this scale is indicative of how awful she was both in media presentation and in actuality.
6. she clearly knew her time was up by November 2022 [ go watch the interviews of that period and see the sudden self-awareness of what she had done.] I have heard that there were Royal snubs, such as Princess Anne visiting NZ to see her race horses, and not doing the usual meet and greets. And also that [we don't say her name] crossed a line somehow, and was asked to step down. I have no evidence of such, just anecdotal stuff, but, let's say the probability of that being true is over 60%. The many nuances of 'crown politics' are outside my mental landscape, but one thing is clear , and that is that NZ as a far distant member of the commonwealth is much harder to defend; A revolution here would mean the end of Crown influence and ownership forever, and the honeypot dividends they get. Such things can spread like wildfire. [ we don't say her name ] threatened the end of the Crown reach by her ham-fisted approach
7. I think it important to remember that she alone could not do these things, but the Cabinet can. Every member of the Labour cabinet is guilty of the same crimes, which are treasonous in nature, if not treasonous by definition ( in our legislation )
8. In analysing [we don't say her name], one should not ignore the structural framework supporting her education and rise into politics. She didn't do this alone; she was chosen a long time ago. That structural framework has to be neutralised to prevent a repeat of this
9. NZ can recover sooner than 15 years, but some blood will have to be spilled, metaphorically or otherwise, and severance of the ties to Britain will have to be entertained , probably implemented, to succeed in this endeavour.
10. re 6.) One realises a contradiction in that this creature was chosen, inserted into the political system, by aforesaid structural framework. To have it then turn its back on her ( and don't let the dame-hood deceive you ) after the 2019 blooding by the Christchurch mosque show seems totally illogical; One asserts that in spite of the 'right' conditioning, the right family, the right connections, the expectations of performance fell well below par and crossed too many lines, and became a massive liability, perhaps one that can't be contained. [We don't say her name] is forever out of the picture, and one hopes a serious meritocratic shift will be undertaken, otherwise, NZ will take a turn to the right, become a republic and the eradication of leftists, globalists, and crown loyalists will resemble a miniature of the French Revolution.
1. we don't say her name
2. it's not empathy, it's wempathy
3. through 2021 I heard people around the entire North Island, not only express their unmitigated hatred for that incompetent, uncharismatic and cognitively challenged , sclerotic bag of bones, but also describe in detail how she should be killed. One had thereto underestimated the imaginative capacity of one's compatriots.
4. in re point 3.; Back in 1984, after the snap election called by Muldoon, there were clear divisions in politics, and some folks hated Muldoon, some hated David Lange.
5. re point 4.; I never heard anyone say how they would kill either of them. To have both instinctive and rationally considered ire against [we don't say her name] on this scale is indicative of how awful she was both in media presentation and in actuality.
6. she clearly knew her time was up by November 2022 [ go watch the interviews of that period and see the sudden self-awareness of what she had done.] I have heard that there were Royal snubs, such as Princess Anne visiting NZ to see her race horses, and not doing the usual meet and greets. And also that [we don't say her name] crossed a line somehow, and was asked to step down. I have no evidence of such, just anecdotal stuff, but, let's say the probability of that being true is over 60%. The many nuances of 'crown politics' are outside my mental landscape, but one thing is clear , and that is that NZ as a far distant member of the commonwealth is much harder to defend; A revolution here would mean the end of Crown influence and ownership forever, and the honeypot dividends they get. Such things can spread like wildfire. [ we don't say her name ] threatened the end of the Crown reach by her ham-fisted approach
7. I think it important to remember that she alone could not do these things, but the Cabinet can. Every member of the Labour cabinet is guilty of the same crimes, which are treasonous in nature, if not treasonous by definition ( in our legislation )
8. In analysing [we don't say her name], one should not ignore the structural framework supporting her education and rise into politics. She didn't do this alone; she was chosen a long time ago. That structural framework has to be neutralised to prevent a repeat of this
9. NZ can recover sooner than 15 years, but some blood will have to be spilled, metaphorically or otherwise, and severance of the ties to Britain will have to be entertained , probably implemented, to succeed in this endeavour.
10. re 6.) One realises a contradiction in that this creature was chosen, inserted into the political system, by aforesaid structural framework. To have it then turn its back on her ( and don't let the dame-hood deceive you ) after the 2019 blooding by the Christchurch mosque show seems totally illogical; One asserts that in spite of the 'right' conditioning, the right family, the right connections, the expectations of performance fell well below par and crossed too many lines, and became a massive liability, perhaps one that can't be contained. [We don't say her name] is forever out of the picture, and one hopes a serious meritocratic shift will be undertaken, otherwise, NZ will take a turn to the right, become a republic and the eradication of leftists, globalists, and crown loyalists will resemble a miniature of the French Revolution.